Moments earlier, Prime Minister Imran Khan spoke at the inauguration ceremony of Qadir University and said that he would make science a “super science” by mixing science with spirituality. For this purpose, the best and brightest Pakistani students will be told to study deeply in Pakistani and Islamic ideology, and further research on this issue.
Previously, a federal minister supported such low marriages as if it were a sacred duty that could not be questioned. The same minister has threatened the assembly of non-Muslim members in the assembly.
Likewise, other ministers have openly supported organizations that are now restored “bans” and they have been prevented from doing so. Drama found the month of Ramadan and the government repeated again and in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and throughout the country, Eid Al-Fitr was celebrated on a different day.
In our country there is a conflict between “Allah Hafiz” and “Allah Hafiz” and those who call Ramadan are also present. Minister of Science and Technology, Raviat Hilal increased the utility committee and has announced to form a committee, which will issue a five-year anniversary calendar. What is surprising is, what is the need to make a committee for computer specialist specialists now, and if only a five-year calendar is needed, why?
These things lead us to the question which is the title of this article. So how old are we? There are two questions. One thing is that we really live in the modern era, and the other is that we talk about topics in the 21st century or not?
For the last (72) years better, we have been confused or annoyed with topics that have nothing to do with the modern era. Because we don’t claim that our country has many talents, but this talent or capacity is only used when we go abroad or lose our ability in this country.
There are many definitions of “modernity” and thousands of books have been written not only on it. Here we will always see what accessories are from modern society.
First of all, modern society must bear tolerance and tolerance. That is, modern countries serve services for everyone regardless of color, race, religion, and sect, and do not support any community or religion, nor do they support any other group.
Such tolerance and tolerance also applies to all neighboring countries. Modern countries try to maintain better relations with all neighbors, and that doesn’t touch our shady noses. If there is a problem, they try to resolve through negotiations and do not stand firm in their position – demonstrating feasibility.
Endurance and tolerance must be done both at the inside and outside levels. For example, if you apply for China, the relationship is good from almost all countries, but internally China is not tolerated and tolerated, which we show in the regions of Tibet and Xinjiang. Thus, India does not show tolerance and tolerance at internal and external levels. As we saw in Kashmir and other regions.
This can also be applied to Pakistan, where relations are worse than all our neighbors, except China and internally, there is no community in tolerance and tolerance as we see in Balochistan and destroying the colors of their religion. .
Apart from this, modern society is not a tradition. That doesn’t mean we throw all our traditions out the window. This only means that modern society allows questions in every tradition. Traditions that have been going on for centuries reflect modern society in the light of modern facts.
Without this examination, no society can claim to be modern. If a tradition is not compromised in the 21st century, then it needs to be reformed so that they can meet the needs of modern times and if that is not possible, this tradition can be abandoned.
Thus, we can call modern society a society based on law, not tradition. This means new rules that make public representatives and discuss them.
When new laws are created, the old tradition goes to the background and society covers itself in modern templates according to new circumstances and removes its defects.
For example, the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights is a combination of relatively new laws in which all state syllabuses are modern and not traded behind their traditions and traditions. Modern society prefers international law and laws that are approved in their local laws and agreements, most of which oppose the enemy and human rights.